AeroMobil: how a flying car got built, flown, and shut down
Thirty years of development, a prototype that genuinely flew, roughly €25 million spent, and no product. The interesting part is where the money went.
Congestion charging here is older than the electronics. The gantries were an upgrade to a scheme from 1975, and they are now being replaced in turn.
Reviewed 2026-08-18 Authority: Land Transport Authority
Singapore introduced the world’s first urban congestion charge in 1975. The Area Licensing Scheme required a paper licence, displayed on the windscreen, to enter the central district during restricted hours, and it was enforced by people standing at the boundary looking at windscreens.
Electronic Road Pricing, launched in 1998, is that idea with the friction taken out.
A gantry charges a vehicle for passing under it during a charged period. The rate depends on three things: which gantry, what class of vehicle, and which half-hour slot. The same gantry can charge nothing at ten in the morning and a substantial amount at half past eight.
That last point is the whole design. The charge is not for the road. It is for using the road at a moment when too many other people want to. Shifting a journey by twenty minutes can change what it costs, which is the behaviour the scheme is trying to buy.
Rates are not fixed by statute and are not set to raise a particular sum. The authority measures average traffic speeds on the charged stretches and reviews the rates against a target band: fast enough that the road is working, slow enough that it is not empty capacity. Where speeds sit inside the band, the rate is left alone. Where they fall below it, the rate goes up; where they run above it, the rate can be reduced or removed.
This is why an ERP rate table is a poor guide to anything except the month it was published, and why a page like this one does not reproduce it.
The successor system moves the charge off the roadside and into the vehicle. An on-board unit uses satellite positioning to determine where the vehicle is, and charges are applied without a structure overhead. Installation began in the mid-2020s and rolls across the vehicle population rather than switching over on a single date.
The significant part is what it removes: the need for a physical gantry at every charging point. A point-based charge requires somewhere to put the point. A system that knows where the vehicle is does not, which is what makes distance-based or cordon-based charging technically available.
Whether any of that is adopted is a policy question and has not followed automatically from the technology. The system was introduced to do what the gantries did, without the gantries.
The two schemes work on different things and are frequently conflated. The Certificate of Entitlement controls how many vehicles exist. Road pricing controls when and where those vehicles are driven. A country could run either without the other; Singapore runs both, and the vehicle quota premiums charted on the transport board are the price of the first, not the second.
For current rates, gantry locations and the state of the replacement programme, the authority is the source of record.
Not in the usual sense. A toll pays for a road. This charges for using a stretch of road at a time when it is congested, and the rate for the same gantry differs across the day, and it can be zero outside the charged period.
Against measured traffic speeds. The authority reviews rates periodically and adjusts them where average speeds on a stretch fall outside a target band. The charge is an instrument aimed at a speed, not a revenue target.
The gantry is being replaced by a satellite-positioning system with an on-board unit in the vehicle. Charging no longer requires physical structures at fixed points, which makes distance-based or area-based charging technically possible.
It makes it possible, not automatic. The successor system was introduced as a replacement for the existing point-based charges; any move to distance charging would be a separate policy decision.
Matched from the archive.
Thirty years of development, a prototype that genuinely flew, roughly €25 million spent, and no product. The interesting part is where the money went.
Every report of a bidding exercise quotes the price. The number that produced it — how many certificates were on offer — is published in the same file and almost never appears beside it.
Four different structures can each claim the title, depending on whether you measure height, bulk, reservoir or output. None of them is wrong.
The largest Adidas store in the world opened on Fifth Avenue in December 2016. The object unveiled inside it was a copy of a statue in a Bavarian stadium.
Two ant species from Papua New Guinea got Game of Thrones names. The reason the paper matters is what microtomography revealed under the spines.
Researchers borrowed the mathematics of epidemics and applied it to mass killings. The estimated window of raised risk is thirteen days.
Start here
COECertificate of Entitlement Topics HDBHousing & Development Board Topics MRTMass Rapid Transit Topics ERPElectronic Road Pricing Topics The dragon ants of New Guinea, and what X-rays found insideScience Stories The premium says little without the quotaTech Stories What a contagion model found in US mass-shooting dataWorld Stories The biggest dam in the world, explained: tallest vs largestTech Stories